The hallucination problem in legal AI is real, but is not unsolvable. Responsible law firms use tools custom-built for Australian legal research and designed for our system of jurisprudence to achieve the best outcomes and mitigate risk.

Law firms are entering a second wave of AI legaltech where generic AI tools are no longer enough. Firms now prefer jurisdiction-specific, workflow-native legal AI platforms with transparency, traceability and real legal intelligence.

Across Australia, small and mid-sized law firms are undergoing one of the most significant structural shifts in the profession’s recent history.

Australian organisations are discovering that policy frameworks can’t compensate for AI systems that were never designed to be verifiable. True governance starts with architecture.

Every lawyer deals with the complexities and stress of database search... what if there was a better way to solve this age-old problem?

As AI becomes more prevalent in the legal field, Habeas is pioneering ethical protocols to ensure this powerful technology is implemented responsibly...

Aussie law firms deserve AI solutions that are tailored to their unique problems and interests.

A brief overview of why Habeas was created.

We took what Deliveroo has, and made it better by improving UX

Understand why Habeas so good at understanding and extracting relevant information

While prompt engineering is useful, it's not a universal language. Problem-solving will still be the lawyer's most important tool when interacting with AI.